Use case · Legal teams

Where did every fact in this brief come from?

Your team drafts with AI now. Every fact in a draft has to hold up when someone asks where it came from, and two sources often disagree.

Step by step

How it works for legal. Each step is a real tool your AI calls.

01
Your AI files the source
Emails, call transcripts and documents are stored as artifacts. They are append-only and never overwritten.
ingest_artifact
02
Each fact links to its source
Your AI records every fact as an observation pointing at the artifact it came from.
add_observation
03
Disagreements stay open
When two sources say different things, a conflict opens and keeps both until a person resolves it.
create_conflict
04
Briefs cite their facts
A brief is built from observations, so every line traces back to a document.
create_brief

Example

Your AIOpenCRM + OpenWatch

What notice period did we agree for termination, and where does it come from?

Two sources disagree: 30 days in the signed agreement, 60 days in the 12 Aug email. I opened a conflict so someone can confirm which applies.

Limits

Need one of these for your team? Building it is the work Attri does.

OpenCRM stores and cites. Your AI does the reading and extraction; OpenCRM does not read documents itself.
No connectors: sources arrive through your AI, not by syncing a mailbox or document system.
No login or permissions in the open-source version. Run it locally, or have Attri host it with login.

Other teams

Clone it from GitHub and add it to your MCP client. When your team needs it hosted, with login, talk to Attri.